Home » Pictures » Youssoupoff V Mgm Pictures

Youssoupoff V Mgm Pictures

24/04/2018 Case Summary: Youssoupoff v Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Citation.

Youssoupoff v Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (1934) 50 TLR 581, CA.

Case History.

The jury found in favour of Youssoupoff.

Facts.

Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Limited produced a film in which a man named Rasputin brought about the destruction of Russia but was subsequently murdered by Prince Chegodieff and others.

, Youssoupoff v Metro-Goldwyn- Mayer Pictures Ltd (1934) 50 TLR 581, wherethe defendants made a film which falsely imputed that the plaintiff had been raped or seduced by Rasputin.

The defamatory matter was in pictorial (as opposed to soundtrack) part of the picture and was held as libel.

The judge in the case, Slesser Lord Judge referred to a.

, Youssoupoff v Metro-Goldwyn-Maher Pictures Ltd (1934): Ra Ra Rasputin # Not the Lover of this Russian Queen Princess Irina Alexandrovna was born in 1895, the granddaughter of Alexander III and niece of the slain Russian Tsar Nicholas II.

She was Russian Royalty, a renowned beauty and when she was single: one of the most eligible#, 28/07/2013 Case Name: Youssoupoff v.

Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Pictures Date: 1934 Jurisdiction: Court of Appeal Rule: A publications is defamatory if: (1) A reasonable 3rd person (2) would believe the statement to be defamatory (3) to another identifiable person.

Brief Analysis: This case is really about not disturbing a jury finding with regards to defamation.

, YOUSSOUPOFF V.

METRO-GOLDWYN-MAYER PICTURES 50 T.

L.

R.

581 (1934) CASE BRIEF YOUSSOUPOFF V.

METRO-GOLDWYN-MAYER PICTURES.

50 T.

L.

R.

581 (1934) NATURE OF THE CASE: This was a suit in defamation.

FACTS: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (D) made a film about Rasputin.

A woman portrayed in the film as having relations with the person represented as the murderer.

, Youssoupoff -v- MGM Pictures (1934) 50 TLR 581 1934 CA Scrutton LJ, Slesser LJ Defamation, Damages Casemap 1 Cites 1 Citers The plaintiff (herself a Princess) complained that she could be identified with the character Princess Natasha in the film “Rasputin, the Mad Monk”.

On the basis that the film suggested that, by reason, 1 Slim v Stretch [1936] All ER 1237 2 Youssoupoff v MGM Pictures Ltd (1934) 50 TLR 581, Columbia Global Freedom of Expression seeks to advance understanding of the international and national norms and institutions that best protect the free flow of information and expression in an inter-connected global community with major common challenges to address.

To achieve its mission, Global Freedom of Expression undertakes and commissions research and policy projects, organizes events.

, YOUSSOUPOFF v.

METRO-GOLDWYN-MAYER PICTURES LTD (1934) 50 TLR 581.

SLESSER, LJ (at 587): ‘.

not only is the matter defamatory if it brings the plaintiff into hatred, ridicule, or contempt by reason of some moral discredit on [the plaintiff’s] part, but also if it tends to make the plaintiff be shunned and avoided and that without any moral.

, Felix led a flamboyant life and is thought to have been bixual.

When he addresses this claim in his book Lost Splendor, however, he flat out denied it.

From 1909 to 1913, he studied Forestry and later English at University College, Oxford, where he was a member of the Bullingdon Club, and established the Oxford Russian Club.

Yusupov was living on 14 King Edward Street, had a Russian cook, a.

youssoupoff v mgm pictures